Compare and contrast the idea of Descartes and Kant on epistemology Essay

Compare and contrast the thinking of Descartes and Kant on epistemology - Essay ExampleDescrates definition of acquaintance is, however, specific to scientific knowledge and demonstration is defined, in the theorists perspective, as absence of enquiry. With cognition as the fundamental to scientific knowledge, two aims of certainty on cognition are identified to define knowledge. With absolute level of certainty, no single doubt exists that an alternative cerebration or subject can be found while moral level of certainty involves conviction on a subject even with the knowledge that the subject could be false. moralistic certainty however identifies possible doubt and according to Descrates, does not therefore define knowledge.1Kants idea on epistemology is based on three factors that further identify opinion and faith. Peoples plausive decisions exist in three levels that distinguish between knowledge, faith, and opinion. There is a subjective basis to certification and an o bjective cause. Affirmation that is devoid of conviction, when conviction is not fitted, is based on opinion. however, subjective factors to affirmation may be sufficient but a person lacks objective basis. Under the circumstance, affirmation is based on faith and not on opinion. Sufficiency of both subjective and objective factors into affirmation defines existence of knowledge. creed and faith are therefore, and according to Kant, elements of knowledge in which sufficient objectivity defines opinion while sufficient subjectivity defines faith and existence of both opinion and faith defines knowledge.2Theories of Kant and Descrates identify both similarities and differences. The two ideas get together to existence of knowledge beyond definitions because experiences and observations inform certainty. In addition, Kant discusses sufficiency of subjectivity and objectivity as essentials of knowledge and such sufficiency are consistent with Descrates ideas of levels of